Talk:New York State Route 375

Latest comment: 15 years ago by Dough4872 in topic GA Review
Good articleNew York State Route 375 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 3, 2009Good article nomineeListed

Change of Intersection Template

edit

This article was changed to bring its intersection template to the NYint format. No other changes were made. It is important to verify, update and/or correct as necessary. Fwgoebel 16:20, 3 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:New York State Route 375/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Comments:

  1. Request a map for the article.
  2. The lead of the article is a little short. Can more information be added.
    The lead is sufficient (if not a bit too long) for such a brief article. –Juliancolton | Talk 17:56, 13 July 2009 (UTC)Reply
  3. "residential homes and commercial buildings" sounds wordy.
  4. The sentence "The highway at the intersection with Pine Street, begins to wind, passing a local football field, and leaves West Hurley for the rural parts of the Catskill Park." sounds awkward. In addition, is it nessecary to mention the route passes a "local football field"?
  5. Change "provides as the eastern terminus for Maverick Road (County Route 43)" to "intersects the eastern terminus of Maverick Road (County Route 43).
  6. The history section of the article is very short. Can some more historical information be added?
  7. Add the names of NY 28 and NY 212 to the major intersections table.

I am placing the article on hold. Dough4872 (talk) 17:44, 13 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

This is 2.92 miles in the middle of nowhere that has had nothing done to the road since 1930, chances this'll expand farther than this are slim. Done with #s 1, 2, 4, 5, 7 - #3 - I've asked that is not wordy, #6 - see previous sentence.Mitch/HC32 17:57, 13 July 2009 (UTC)Reply
I will pass the article. Dough4872 (talk) 17:58, 13 July 2009 (UTC)Reply