Talk:New York State Route 61
Latest comment: 2 years ago by NE2 in topic Former NY 18E??
New York State Route 61 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
edit- This review is transcluded from Talk:New York State Route 61/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Once again, a well-written article that just needs a few minor changes:
- A map would help quite a bit.
- Will as soon as possible.Mitch32(UP) 10:16, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
- The wikilink to Niagara Falls should go to Niagara Falls, New York.
- Done - Mitch32(UP) 10:16, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
- Italicizing "Hyde Park Boulevard" doesn't seem consistent with other road articles.
- Done - Mitch32(UP) 10:16, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
- "the roadway widens to include a center turn lane" - maybe it's just been a long day at work, but I can't picture this. Is there an intersection that just isn't mentioned in the prose?
- Done - Mitch32(UP) 10:16, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
- should "turn lane" be "turning lane"? I've never heard anyone talk about a "turn lane", but this might be a regional difference.
- Done - Mitch32(UP) 10:16, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
- "NY 61 meets Ferry Avenue" - does this mean that they join (become concurrent)?
- Done - Mitch32(UP) 10:16, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
- "in the shadow of the Niagara Falls Courthouse" - "in the shadow of" doesn't seem encyclopedic.
- Done - Mitch32(UP) 10:16, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
- "NY 61 meets northbound US 62" - again, does this mean that they join? Is there another way of phrasing it so that it doesn't use exactly the same word (meets) as the previous sentence?
- Done - Mitch32(UP) 10:16, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
- "The pairing of Gill Creek and NY 61" - What is meant by "the pairing"?
- Done - Mitch32(UP) 10:16, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
- "(355 feet (108 m) long)" - parentheses inside parentheses are frowned upon. Since a conversion template is being used that automatically inserts parentheses, it seems like the sentence will have to be rephrased to get rid of the parentheses around "355 feet long".
- Done - Mitch32(UP) 10:16, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
- "before separating" -> "before they separate"
- Done - Mitch32(UP) 10:16, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
- "here carrying NY 182" - does this mean that Porter Road is designated as NY 182 at this point?
- Done - Mitch32(UP) 10:16, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
- "where it turns west toward the Whirlpool Rapids Bridge" - "it" needs to be clarified, as three roads have been discussed in the first half of the sentence.
- Done - Mitch32(UP) 10:16, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
- "originally constructed in 1950, was reconstructed" - can one of the "constructed"s be changed to avoid repetition?
- Done - Mitch32(UP) 10:16, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
- References 7 and 8 need publishers.
- I tried, I don't think its a reliable source - but it'll do for now.Mitch32(UP) 10:16, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
I'll place this on hold for now. Comments and questions can be placed here. Thanks, GaryColemanFan (talk) 02:59, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
- All done. :) - Mitch32(UP) 10:16, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
- It's getting close. The map would help quite a bit—any word on that? In "The paralleling of Gill Creek and NY 61", "paralleling" sounds awkward. The "here carrying NY 182" sentence hasn't been changed, so I still find it confusing. Aside from this, everything's looking good. Thanks for the quick response, GaryColemanFan (talk) 15:52, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
- Probably should promote without the map. The rest are done though.Mitch32(UP) 19:51, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
- I'm happy with everything except the lack of a map. I agree that holding the nomination until a map can be made isn't productive, so I am promoting it. I have placed a request for a map at Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Roads/Maps task force/Requests. If you are able to make or obtain one before the task force does, I would really appreciate it if you could delete my request. Thanks, GaryColemanFan (talk) 05:15, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
- Probably should promote without the map. The rest are done though.Mitch32(UP) 19:51, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
- It's getting close. The map would help quite a bit—any word on that? In "The paralleling of Gill Creek and NY 61", "paralleling" sounds awkward. The "here carrying NY 182" sentence hasn't been changed, so I still find it confusing. Aside from this, everything's looking good. Thanks for the quick response, GaryColemanFan (talk) 15:52, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
- All done. :) - Mitch32(UP) 10:16, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
Former NY 18E??
editIs this map in error? --NE2 22:41, 14 August 2022 (UTC)