Talk:New Zealand–United Kingdom relations

New Zealand High‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

United Kingdom Mid‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

International relations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Draft Changes

Latest comment: 14 years ago8 comments2 people in discussion

I've put together a draft for extension of this article, as one of fairly wide general interest (in my opinion as a UK citizen in NZ :) ), rated as High importance but still a Stub, and the one of those on which I felt least unqualified to do some work.

Since this is a fairly substantial change, I've put together a draft rather than editing directly: User:Philtweir/New Zealand – United Kingdom relations. This is far from complete and contains a number of stub-sections, scant references and cn's, but my hope is that, with its weaknesses, if this draft is implemented into mainspace, editors will feel able to chip in when they spot something and that, to the casual reader, this should still be more informative, without being particularly misleading (I hope!), than the current article.

Rather than editing the draft and creating a new history fork, would editors be happy for this to be sanctioned (or vetoed) here, first, before making changes, please? If there are any show-stoppers, please mention here. (PS: apologies to anybody who's spotted that this is the second time I've done this, for different reasons; not planning to make it a regular occurrence!) Philtweir (talk) 02:44, 14 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

I should point out that most of the new references are web-pages rather than paper-based, though generally official sources (I think they all are, but will have to double-check in case). They will also need expanding, but will they suffice for the moment? Philtweir (talk) 03:06, 14 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

For the moment they're fine. I think you need to mention New Zealand nationality law becoming distinct from British nationality from 1949, the Governor-General no longer serving as the UK's High Commissioner to NZ from List of High Commissioners from the United Kingdom to New Zealand. --Lholden (talk) 04:01, 14 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Added accordingly. Thanks for the feedback! If there are no objections, I'll move the corrected version over in the next day or so and changes can take place at leisure.Philtweir (talk) 06:02, 14 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

I think the sentence "In New Zealand however, the republican movement is somewhat smaller, and British sentiment stronger than that of Australia" should be removed. It doesn't make any sense to me. Also, it's worth pointing out that both the UK and New Zealand have the same person as head of state, even though the Queen is resident in the UK. --Lholden (talk) 08:40, 14 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Briefly mentioned the shared monarch and removed that unqualified statement you mentioned; however, the rest of the pre-existing stuff's probably easier to edit once the whole thing's moved over - I've generally tried to avoid both adding new and editing old in the draft, just to avoid complicating things too much. Philtweir (talk) 09:56, 14 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Changes implemented; thanks Lholden (talk · contribs) for input! Philtweir (talk) 00:14, 15 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Just did a major copyedit. See WP:MOS for more. --Lholden (talk) 04:32, 15 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on New Zealand–United Kingdom relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080514220150/http://www.fco.gov.uk/en/about-the-fco/country-profiles/asia-oceania/new-zealand/?profile=intRelations&pg=4 to http://www.fco.gov.uk/en/about-the-fco/country-profiles/asia-oceania/new-zealand?profile=intRelations&pg=4

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:42, 21 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (February 2018)

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on New Zealand–United Kingdom relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:56, 17 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic