Talk:Newark, New Jersey/GA2

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Ankit Maity in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ankit Maity (talk · contribs) 16:22, 25 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
    • Short sections and paragraphs are discouraged.
    • A word only needs to be wikilinked once within each section.
    • Avoid Peacock Terms, such as "beautiful", "famous", "popular", "well-known", "significant", "important" and "obvious".
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    • More sources needed. It is needed wherever marked {{cn}}.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
    • Images need succinct captions.
    • An image caption should only end with a full-stop if it forms a complete sentence.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Everything should be good to go now...
Captions have been tightened, with unnecessary full-stops removed. Redundant wikileaks have been removed. Peacock terms have been removed and rewritten. :Short subsections have been reorganized or merged together. Citations have been provided for all [citation needed] tags.
If there is anything else necessary to make this a good article, please let me know.--Chimino (talk) 04:40, 10 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
Blank sections should be eliminated. See, "Elected officials, past and present" and "Notable residents".--Ankit MaityTalkContribs 11:35, 11 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
  Done--Chimino (talk) 14:07, 11 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.