This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Inadequate
editThis article needs improvement, while not incorrect it is very vague and superficial. The single equation given does not make much sense and the terms are not even defined. 167.206.60.130 (talk) 14:32, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
- Agree. the article doesn't really define an estimator. I still don't know what the shit is. Jackzhp (talk) 01:48, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
Very Inadequate
editWhat`s means this equation? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.77.141.88 (talk) 23:21, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
Assessment comment
editThe comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Newey–West estimator/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
The formula at the bottom of the article lacks descriptions for its terms.WaltFrench (talk) 21:40, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |
Last edited at 01:42, 1 January 2012 (UTC). Substituted at 02:23, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Inadequate
editThe above comments are still accurate. This page uses notation that it does not even define.
It appears that the notation follows that of Heteroscedasticity-consistent_standard_errors. If this is true, then someone who is familiar with the topic (not me!) may be able to incorporate that notation easily. Jmacwiki (talk) 15:52, 24 October 2017 (UTC)