Talk:Nicholas Colasanto

Untitled

I don't think there is a spoonerism involved here. Spoonerisms as explained by the relevant article are all about the transposition of the first syllables.

Fair use rationale for Image:Cheers coach.jpg

Image:Cheers coach.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:22, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Columbo

Colasanto directed another Columbo's Episode: Étude in Black

See: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0068398/

--PaoVac (talk) 17:05, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

contradiction

This article says he returned for one last scene on Cheers. The Coach Ernie Pantusso article says that this scene was cut from an earlier episode. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.91.182.215 (talk) 06:45, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

Bad sentence.

"He has been posthumously honored with the picture of Geronimo, which was used by the late Colasanto as part of his dressing room at the studio set of Cheers and was left hanging at the bar wall of the Cheers production set."

This is a really bad sentence. I'd fix it, but I don't know what it's trying to say. I'm pretty sure it doesn't mean Colasanto was honored and then left hanging on a wall. Who would do that to Coach? And, I don't think the late Colasanto used a picture, or had a dressing room. Dead men don't have dressing rooms, as a rule. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.25.29.167 (talk) 06:42, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

I've fixed the sentence. The source says that Colasanto used the picture while he was alive and that the picture was placed at a decor. --George Ho (talk) 07:12, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Personal life?

I'm surprised to see so little here about his personal life, since he was such a big presence on TV in the 1980s. On IMDB, I came across a brief marriage [Charlene Jennings (1972 - 1972) (divorced)] but that was it, nothing else listed, no kids, nothing. Is there any more information about his life beyond his career? 69.125.134.86 (talk) 20:04, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

Reliable sources are needed; imdb is not reliable. --George Ho (talk) 20:24, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

Lede rewrite

@George Ho and Gh87 in the public computer: per your request on my talk page I have done a rewrite of the lede. It is a bit rough so please feel free to tweak it as you wish. Cheers! Jbh^Talk 00:07, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nicholas Colasanto. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121106225845/http://digicoll.library.wisc.edu/cgi/f/findaid/findaid-idx?c=wiarchives;view=reslist;subview=standard;didno=uw-whs-tape00339a;focusrgn=summaryinfo;cc=wiarchives;byte=50771135 to http://digicoll.library.wisc.edu/cgi/f/findaid/findaid-idx?c=wiarchives;view=reslist;subview=standard;didno=uw-whs-tape00339a;focusrgn=summaryinfo;cc=wiarchives;byte=50771135

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:09, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Nicholas Colasanto/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: No Great Shaker (talk · contribs) 06:20, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

Basic GA criteria

1. Well written: the prose is clear and concise.
2. Well written: the spelling and grammar are correct.
3. Complies with the MOS guidelines for lead sections.
4. Complies with the MOS guidelines for article structure and layout.
5. Complies with the MOS guidelines for words to watch.
6. Complies with the MOS guidelines for writing about fiction – not applicable.
7. Complies with the MOS guidelines for list incorporation – not applicable.
8. Complies with the MOS guidelines for use of quotations.
9. All statements are verifiable with inline citations provided.
10. All inline citations are from reliable sources, etc.
11. Contains a list of all references in accordance with the layout style guideline.
12. No original research.
13. No copyright violations or plagiarism.
14. Broad in its coverage but within scope and in summary style.
15. Neutral.
16. Stable.
17. Illustrated, if possible.
18. Images are at least fair use and do not breach copyright.

Hello, George Ho. I'll be doing this review and will use the checklist above to register progress. Hope to provide some feedback soon. No Great Shaker (talk) 06:41, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

Report

One fair use relevant image and the article is stable. Will continue later. No Great Shaker (talk) 07:31, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

The article is fine and I'm promoting it to GA. Quite a bit of copyediting was necessary but nothing major so, instead of creating a list here and putting everything on hold, I made the necessary changes. One thing you need to watch is conflicting use of sfn and harvnb. I prefer sfn so I transferred the two or three harvnb citations to sfn format, for consistency and efficiency reasons, and added ref=harv to the three books concerned.

Some reviewers might say the article is too short at 3,782b and 628 words of readable prose size, but I would strongly disagree. Obviously, there is scope for expansion but that might well introduce excessive unnecessary detail. I doubt if there is much more that can be said about Nicholas Colasanto within a summary article and so it does comply with both GACR 3a and 3b.

Well done. Geronimo! No Great Shaker (talk) 09:41, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

Coxwain

Coxwain is a job not a rank. 75.168.112.39 (talk) 05:01, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

"Co-star Ted Danson later said Colasanto had difficulty remembering his lines" (in NC's final weeks on set)

Does that point to hardening of the arteries which AFAIK leads to increasing memory loss and also cognitive decline? 180.150.38.126 (talk) 10:04, 3 March 2024 (UTC)