Page edits and content seems to be written in a public relations perspective

edit

Most of the page is authored by single-purpose accounts and IPs that only edit this page, and tends to be written in advertiser-speak. Even after clearing up a segment on this page, a new single-purpose IP address re-added the removed materials back into the page with no explanation. Even the photograph of Nick Graham is uploated by a single-purpose Wikimedia Commons account with only one sandbox edit in Wikipedia space. Because of these egregious editorial violations, there's going to be some cutting. Don't cry deletionism, the page deserves it. Mewnst (talk) 03:06, 18 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Sorry for the previous message, it was written while I was inebriated. Thankfully nothing bad happened. I know better than to do that. Mewnst (talk) 18:33, 14 May 2022 (UTC)Reply