Talk:Nick Cook (writer)
This article was nominated for deletion on 23 November 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Unsourced Statements
editThe bulk of this vanity article consisted of unsourced, editorial statements. As per WP:BLP all sentences not supported by a RS citation have been deleted. BlueSalix (talk) 12:32, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
worthless article
editAll the sources for the article are either self-published or self-referrential. In particular, all the biographical details are indirectly coming from Nick Cook himself. Its not at all clear why this article even exists. 12.12.144.130 (talk) 18:14, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
Affiliation with Janes
editNick Cook ceased to be an editor at Janes around 15 years ago. He has not written anything for Janes in any capacity that I'm aware of since around 2007. The article gives a very inaccurate impression of his affiliation to Janes and its publications. Its equally inaccurate to call him a journalist today.
The most accurate description of him today would be defense industry consultant with a focus on environmental and climate topics.75.17.124.178 (talk) 00:32, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Nick Cook (writer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131104175440/http://www.forteantimes.com/features/articles/184/nazi_ufos.html to http://www.forteantimes.com/features/articles/184/nazi_ufos.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:26, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
Contact details
editHi, working on something here which could possibly be significant.
If my reasoning is correct CERN and others are on the cusp of discovering antigravity.
Does anyone have contact details for the writer mentioned please? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.3.100.42 (talk) 06:08, 13 August 2019 (UTC)