Talk:Nick Houghton

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 00:13, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

How do I add this?

|- || Panglima Gagah Angkatan Tentera || 2015 (Malaysia, honorary) |-

No need to do so. It is an honorary award, which is not permitted to be worn on his medal bar. Richard Harvey (talk) 22:51, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Full name

According to the UK Parliament website ([1]), his full name is John Ian Nicholas Reynolds Houghton, but many other sources say that that is John Nicholas Reynolds Houghton (no Ian):
The London Gazette: https://www.thegazette.co.uk/notice/2913463
City of London: http://democracy.cityoflondon.gov.uk/mgAi.aspx?ID=56643
Getty Images: http://www.gettyimages.fi/detail/news-photo/chief-of-the-defence-staff-of-the-british-armed-forces-news-photo/477777831?#chief-of-the-defence-staff-of-the-british-armed-forces-general-sir-picture-id477777831
The Nation (Thailand Portal): http://www.nationmultimedia.com/aec/British-Chief-of-Defence-Staff-meets-top-Myanmar-l-30276739.html
CommonSpace: https://www.commonspace.scot/articles/2870/jeremy-corbyn-tells-british-military-stay-out-public-politics
The Jordan Times: http://www.jordantimes.com/news/local/army-chief-meet-british-counterpart
--Editor FIN (talk) 15:18, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nick Houghton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120716225542/http://www.spc.ox.ac.uk/text/321/notable_alumni.html to http://www.spc.ox.ac.uk/text/321/notable_alumni.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:59, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Life peerages & infoboxes

Please do come along and discuss at: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom#Life peerages & infoboxes DBD 18:52, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

The Right Honourable

As a baron, he has the honorific The Right Honourable. The place for this is the |honorific_prefix= in the infobox. Could Dormskirk explain why he removed it with the summary "not needed"? Gaia Octavia Agrippa ^Talk 11:38, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

I agree that he has the right to use it. I was merely trying to maintain a degree of standardisation across military infoboxes. Best wishes. Dormskirk (talk) 12:06, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

Awards table

Twice now my edits to remove the recently added and severely under referenced medal table have been reverted. The first revert provided no explanation, and the second justified the revert because, according to the IP, the material "had to be added". I am not aware of any policy that mandates the inclusion of such tables. As I have noted in my edit summaries, however, the severe under referencing violates WP:BLP and WP:V. The table is also formatted in a confusing manner and the few referenced entries are already covered in prose, making the table also unnecessarily repetitive. Opening for discussion here, with the recommendation that the table be removed. Cheers, Abraham, B.S. (talk) 01:48, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

I agree that the table should be removed. There is no such policy that mandates the inclusion of such tables. It is severely undersourced and those few awards that are sourced are already mentioned in the main text above. Dormskirk (talk) 07:08, 28 July 2024 (UTC)