Talk:Nick Pacheco
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changes
editPolitician
editProffesional hand jobber, loves it on his palms
Another fact should be mentioned
editAccording to the California Bar Association at http://members.calbar.ca.gov/fal/Member/Detail/173391 Nick Pacheco has been barred from practicing law in California pursuant to multiple disciplinary actions relating to failures to represent clients and failure to return client funds. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.73.112.57 (talk) 20:44, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
This article sounds pretty positive considering some of the sleazy things he did. Many Angelenos still remember when he argued that the 14th should include a slice of downtown despite making no sense whatsoever.
I agree. As a 14th District L.A. councilmember, Pacheco was sleezy, disrespectful to community members, and he too often looked out solely for his own personal interests as opposed to the best interests of the community. I recently saw him interacting with people at an event and he hasn't changed his shameful ways.
NPOV
editCouncilman Nick Pacheco was known for being an independent voice that gave every one an opportunity to be heard. Can this be verified? Perhaps it should be removed if it is not factual. CoolGuy 19:19, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
Nick Pacheco Page
editI nominated this page for speedy deletion as I felt this subject wasn't notable based on the information listed currently on the page. It was overturned, which I agreee with, especially looking at Mr Pacheco's history and doing more research it should have a wikipedia. A lot of things are left off his page that I think has significant importance that I will add to it. Causeandedit (talk) 23:29, 8 December 2012 (UTC)