Talk:Nick Studio 10

First post

I think this page needs to be locked due to all the vandalism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.210.69.248 (talk) 04:40, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Criticism

Should be a criticism section. 75.111.63.85 (talk) 20:17, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

There should be one considering all the criticism they get. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.55.146.239 (talk) 22:49, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Change to Indefinite

I think the editing lock (it expires in July 2013, I think) should be changed to indefinite, as to prevent future vandalism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.29.142.42 (talk) 20:21, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

7/27 is when the protection ends. 75.111.63.85 (talk) 03:06, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

I asked for limited because I'm sure Nick Studio 10 will probably make way for Nick's usual Nicktoons Summer Jam (aka every SpongeBob episode repeated 29 times until Labor Day) block by June and this will either go away or return in September. July should be good enough; if not we go to six-months, then a year, then indefinite going by past histories with these kinds of articles. Nate • (chatter) 03:17, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Canceled?

Is this block canceled, since I don't see it on anymore? Or it could be on hiatus? I could not find anything about it. Tinton5 (talk) 02:01, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

As far as I know, it's liklely cancelled, given the poor reception. Someone should add that on the page.75.111.63.85 (talk) 22:38, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Reception

It's obviously written from the point of view of a critic. It needs to be neutral. CtP (t • c) 18:58, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Criticism and Controversy section

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Why not add that section? I feel there is nothing wrong with addressing the controversy. This block was controversial and the people deserve to know about it. Why be so stubborn to not allow it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by VintageVHSTreasures (talk • contribs) 22:41, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Because the target audience literally didn't care. The only people who did were older adults who really have no say about what a kid's network can program for their viewers. It had a four-month life that nobody in 2016 remembers. It's literally a resume checkoff. And unless someone behind the scenes or one of the cast members somehow puts out a tell-all about how allegedly terrible this programming block was, it is forever unsourced by anything reliable. That's our standard; nobody ever wrote an article about this beyond EPGs saying it existed and the web/social channels of Nick saying so. It's been over four years. It stays out because the 'reaction' is unsourced by RS'es in any way. Nate • (chatter) 03:01, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

So let's say if it did manage to capture media attention from sources like Fox News, Variety, CNN and other TV and print media, would it still be possible to add it? Is that what you're trying to say? User: VintageVHSTreasures 14:41, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

...And we're done. In the words of Regina George, "Stop trying to make fetch happen. It isn't going to happen." No news source is going to write about a minor block of children's programming that went away because it just didn't catch on and try to mine controversy about it, because they'd look like petty jerks for trying to damage the careers of children who were only following a script. Nick had four-five of these blocks that quietly ended because they just didn't work. So did Cartoon Network, Disney, NBC and many local stations in the 90's. Consider this discussion closed and don't try to restart it; the 'controversy' was among a few select people and didn't even last past Labor Day 2013. Stop it. Nate • (chatter) 00:23, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.