This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Nick Tatham is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability articles
Latest comment: 18 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion
Can I ask why you feel that Nick Tatham's page should be deleted? He has been awarded an honour live on British TV (Meridian Tonight), has released two EPs (one of which was reviewed on CDTimes.co.uk), appeared in a feature film which is featured on IMDb, shot a music video, he has a website which mentions the number of gigs he undertakes (plus song clips), and he is mentioned on the Tourette syndrome page as a person who is notable for his achievements whilst suffering from the condition. In fact, his first EP was actually promoted by the Tourette Syndrome Association (TSA) in the UK. Richardbooth15:45, 20 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
Then why is information to support these points conspicuously missing from the article? As it currently stands, the only link in the article itself happens to be for your company. Is that just a coincidence??? --Folajimi16:00, 20 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
Yes. It was added by a known vandal whose IP address is frequently being blocked by the administrators here on Wikipedia. I will strive to add sources to this article in the next couple of days. One can't help but think you're building up a vendetta against me, though. Richardbooth17:18, 20 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
Whether or not that IP is an I.P. is immaterial; the presence of weasel words in the article is still an issue. As for your vendetta paranoia, that is your problem to deal with. While your conduct on Wikipedia leaves something to be desired, I have no axe to grind with you. Besides, when it comes to "unmentionable undesirables", I can think of at least a half-dozen wikipedes whom you don't even hold a candle to... --Folajimi17:34, 20 June 2006 (UTC)Reply