Talk:Nicola Napoli

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Military history: Russian & Soviet

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force

Untitled

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article makes several un-verifiable claims about Nicola Napoli and Artkino Pictures – including, but not limited to, that Mr. Napoli passed information to Soviet intelligence and that Artkino did not comply fully with the FARA Act.

The article is misleading in its characterization of the content of the Verona project decrypt – which actually has Mr. Napoli “not wanting to listen to” the individual attempting to contact him. (http://www.nsa.gov/public_info/_files/venona/1944/2dec_manhattan_project_scientists.pdf)

The references that the article provides do not support any elements of the article. The link to the FBI Silvermaster file is broken. The book by John Earl Haynes and Harvey Klehr does not list Mr. Napoli or Artkino Pictures in its extensive index. Mr. Napoli is listed in the book’s Appendix A which makes some of the same un-verifiable claims. RobMadell (talk) 13:41, 20 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Add topic