Talk:Nicolas-Louis de Lacaille

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

France

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Astronomy Mid‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

"One of his constellation is the group Pyxis named after a type of greek pottery." Deleted; Pyxis is Latin for compass, and the statement isn't relevant: there is a list below the article of the constellations he added. Ptomato 20:19, 10 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Birth Date

Latest comment: 7 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Lacaille's birth date is given as 15 May 1713 on p. 665 in the Biographical Encyclopedia of Astronomers, Vol. 1 (Hockey, ed., 2007) and other sources. Isn't this the correct date of his birth? Doesper (talk) 04:17, 9 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

I think you want to say 15 March and not 15 May. Anyway, the date was changed on 15 march 2013 by Capester, but the reference text give only a hypothesis with conditional (ce serait donc à tort). So, i remove the change to put 15 march. You/somebody could explain by a note why le birthday is note sure, as i do in the french wikipedia here ; sorry i am not enough fluent in english to do it myself ;-( --Epsilon0 (talk) 01:12, 17 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

In fact i have changed the present note. --Epsilon0 (talk) 01:27, 17 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Fifteen or fourteen constellations?

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The article says twice that Lacaille named 15 of the official constellations. The second time it says that, it follows the statement with a list of 14, not 15 constellations. As far as naming new constellations outright, I believe the figure 14 is correct. He also proposed breaking up the huge constellation of his day Argo Navis into three, and his catalog went part of the way to doing that. It has since been done officially, more or less according to his proposal--the new constellations being Carina, Vela, and Puppis. Taking those into account, he arguably named 17. Uporządnicki (talk) 17:30, 14 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Possible mistake

Latest comment: 7 months ago2 comments1 person in discussion

The phrase "half inch" seems to be a mistake. The reference does not work. 2A00:23C7:9985:1701:5932:BA80:8A21:70FB (talk) 12:25, 18 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

The editor has been blocked. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C7:9985:1701:5932:BA80:8A21:70FB (talk) 12:36, 18 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic