Talk:Nigel Savage

Latest comment: 1 year ago by 71.212.114.203 in topic Voice

Did you know nomination

edit
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk13:55, 16 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Created by Coin945 (talk). Self-nominated at 23:36, 5 November 2022 (UTC).Reply

  • (edit conflict) The article is new enough and long enough, and is adequately sourced. Still waiting on a QPQ. The hook is intriguing to non-specialists, and is both cited inline and verified in the source. I'm not sure though if "Legacy" is a good section title considering he's still alive, not to mention the "Notes" section is empty. On the other hand, Earwigs, although giving a green score, showed this link and the article does appear to have some slight paraphrasing of that source, so that needs to be addressed. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 11:37, 11 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
I see that Whispyhistory already made a review, however I edit conflicted, and not wanting to put my intended review to waste, I'll leave it here as a comment. I will however defer to Whispyhistory on whether or not the article is ready. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 11:37, 11 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
  1. Complete QPQ - Done.
  2. Review 'Legacy' section. - Done.
  3. Remove Notes section. (I included one note using the 'Refn' template, which I thought would move it to Notes, but it decided to sit in the References section instead.) - Done.
  4. Review and paraphrase content from https://hazon.org/about/nigel/ - Done.
  Thank you Narutolovehinata5 and @Coin945:. QPQ done (just need to sign it). No copyvio issues and the rest adjusted. Whispyhistory (talk) 05:18, 14 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Voice

edit

This article reads like an advert. Hazon working conditions have been extremely controversial and the org has been sued repeatedly by former employees. Nigel’s role in these should be mentioned. 71.212.114.203 (talk) 23:47, 2 March 2023 (UTC)Reply