Talk:Nikki Webster

New Single #2 "I Can't Get Enough"

Nikki has also said the next single will be called. I Can't Get Enough http://offmb.nikkiwebster.dk/index.php/topic,2984.0.html

New Single & New Record Label

Music Video

• Nikki Webster - Devilicious on Piller Records
• Nikki Webster - Devilicious

New Record Label

• Piller Records —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.221.180.52 (talk) 14:31, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Name Change

In 2007, Nikki changed her name from Webster to Keane. Found on website posted. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 124.191.113.13 (talk) 07:45:01, August 2, 2007 (UTC)

And I removed any reference to this from the article. Using an alias on a social networking site is not evidence of a legal name change. Until there is further evidence this shouldn't be re-added. - arkenstone 14:05, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

re: what do you do with your life —Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.30.152.151 (talk) 11:32, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Needs an update...

This paragraph has been there since the article was started (in 2004):

Webster released a cover version of "Dancing in the Street" by Martha and the Vandellas reached the top twenty while her 2004 single "Let's Dance" also reached the top 40 in Australia. These singles come from an album to be released later in 2004 with all songs on the theme of dancing.

It's now rapidly approaching 2007... does anyone want to update this information at all? Gohst 11:50, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Merge Nikki Webster discography

I have proposed the Nikki Webster discography page to be merged into the Nikki Webster article because the Nikki Webster article is not very big and has room for her discography. Lillygirl 07:55, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

photo shoots

I think this article should mention her multiple photo shoots for the mens magazine's FHM and ZOO, however I can't find direct references on their websites. Master z0b (talk) 00:47, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

midwife?

Why is her occupation listed as midwife? Theres no reference to that in the article and i'm pretty sure its made up. love my rice (talk) 14:43, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

• http://snd.sc/13TzEBp

  Triggered by \bsnd\.sc\b on the global blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 17:01, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

 Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Offline 09:06, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Where's the guts of this article?

The lead correctly tells us "She is best known for her starring role in the 2000 Sydney Summer Olympics opening ceremony...", but the article contains a whole two more sentences on that event. Surely that should be the major emphasis of this article. HiLo48 (talk) 04:07, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Nikki Webster/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)

Press [show] to view →

C-class The article is substantial, but is still missing important content or contains a lot of irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant issues or require substantial cleanup. The article is better developed in style, structure and quality than Start-Class, but fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements; need editing for clarity, balance or flow; or contain policy violations such as bias or original research. B-class The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations where necessary. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited. The use of citation templates such as {{cite web}} is not required, but the use of <ref></ref> tags is encouraged. Article has only two in-line references. Vast improvement required here for B-class. The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for an A-Class article, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing. Portions of life history are missing whereas information about relationship with Dance partner is largely irrelevant and unencyclopedic. The article has a defined structure. Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a lead section and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind. Lead is weak, more important details needed here. Confusion with over-lapping sections on: "Recent career" vs "Fourth studio album (2006-present)" needs to be reconciled. The article is reasonably well-written. The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but it certainly need not be "brilliant". The Manual of Style need not be followed rigorously. Problems with flow and style especially in sections just mentioned. Also subject should be referred to as Webster after first mention of Nikki Webster. The article contains supporting materials where appropriate. Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams and an infobox etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content. The article presents its content in an appropriately accessible way. It is written with as broad an audience in mind as possible. Although Wikipedia is more than just a general encyclopedia, the article should not assume unnecessary technical background and technical terms should be explained or avoided where possible. More needed here to provide access to general reader. Evaluation based on WikiProject Biography Assessment Quality scale. Please update this list when the article meets any of the above criteria, changing the article's class assessment as appropriate. Last reviewed by – shaidar cuebiyar ( talk | contribs ) 04:54, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

Last edited at 04:54, 21 October 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 01:17, 30 April 2016 (UTC)