| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Nikon D2X article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
D2Xs
editThe D2Xs section should include information about the fact that the only hardware upgrade is an lcd, and all the software features are gained by the non-"s" D2X when it's firmware is upgraded.
Done! But it's the LCD, the viewfinder lcd, and the battery that are different. The battery is, of course, compatible with the older ver. Micahmedia (talk) 07:15, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
link dead
editthe EISA Awards 2005/2006 weblink is dead —Preceding unsigned comment added by Titimaster (talk • contribs) 08:35, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
- The dead ref has been replaced. SCΛRECROW 08:44, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
Headline image
editThe headline image is yet another awful shot of a camera in a shop window, with a price tag, taken by a chap called Rama. This seems to have been his visual trademark; shoddy images of cameras taken in a shop window. As he couldn't be bothered to ask the shopkeeper to put it on the counter, for heaven's sake, or something. It beggars belief that not a single Wikipedia user in eight years has managed to find a good picture of a D2x. It has hardly rare. It's not as if photographers don't use Wikipedia. What went wrong? Is someone keeping this image there? -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 22:04, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
- Ashley, I agree that the photo is not great to say the least, even if it's better than nothing. Had no luck at Commons, so I found and transferred this image from Flickr. It's not that great either, but might work with adjusted levels and a crop. So, if anyone thinks it's worth a try... GregorB (talk) 14:38, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
