Talk:Nils Bejerot
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Article improvement tags
editI agree that an article almost always can be improved. But a lot of tags in article with sources with unspecified claims is a type of vandalism Dala11a (talk) 19:27, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
- I'm not sure what you expected when you dumped those very long quotes in, and used the man's bio page as a platform for your POV on drugs and drug policy. The tags represent real issues with the article which would need to be addressed to achieve GA status. None of the tags used require specific claims to be outlined, but if you feel any of the tags are unwarrented feel free to explain why. NJGW (talk) 19:32, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
- My POV? The relevant question is if the article reflects Bejerot's work and books etc. The tags are conflicting. Complain about to many quotes and in the same time complains about that the text may not reflect Bejerot's books. His bio page includes links to several of of his books in a full PDF-version. That must bee the best source you can have for the text in his books. Dala11a (talk) 20:04, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
- Your POV on drug policy is reflected by the way you edit drug related articles, and especially by this message on your talk page. You may have a conflict of interest as you are emotionally invested in the topic, and it is reflected by the way you interpret sources.
- My POV? The relevant question is if the article reflects Bejerot's work and books etc. The tags are conflicting. Complain about to many quotes and in the same time complains about that the text may not reflect Bejerot's books. His bio page includes links to several of of his books in a full PDF-version. That must bee the best source you can have for the text in his books. Dala11a (talk) 20:04, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
- You are also misunderstanding one of the tags (I'm not sure which one). I don't think this article needs more about what Nil's books are about, and I don't argue whether or not the text of the books is reflected. This article needs more about who this guy is, where he's from, what he's done, why he's notable, who recognizes that, and then a smaller section about what his drug policy is, and an even smaller section about his books. Also, text from his books is not the best source for discussing the books. What you need are secondary and tertiary sources which discuss his books and their merits. NJGW (talk) 20:55, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
- In practice I have for ex. used a collection of essays about Nils Bejerot and large number of Webb pages as a source. Most of them are in Swedish but I have added a few more sources in English and the collection of essays as a source.Dala11a (talk) 15:14, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
- Removed the anachronism tag. When reading the article, I couldn't understand why it has been placed there.Choccam (talk) 14:48, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
- In practice I have for ex. used a collection of essays about Nils Bejerot and large number of Webb pages as a source. Most of them are in Swedish but I have added a few more sources in English and the collection of essays as a source.Dala11a (talk) 15:14, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
- You are also misunderstanding one of the tags (I'm not sure which one). I don't think this article needs more about what Nil's books are about, and I don't argue whether or not the text of the books is reflected. This article needs more about who this guy is, where he's from, what he's done, why he's notable, who recognizes that, and then a smaller section about what his drug policy is, and an even smaller section about his books. Also, text from his books is not the best source for discussing the books. What you need are secondary and tertiary sources which discuss his books and their merits. NJGW (talk) 20:55, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Nils Bejerot. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070622121241/http://www.rns.se/swedish-addiction.asp to http://www.rns.se/swedish-addiction.asp
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110610141829/http://www.drugtext.org/library/articles/92333.html to http://www.drugtext.org/library/articles/92333.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110927050525/http://www.drugtext.org/Second-Brain-Report/drug-addiction-2.html to http://www.drugtext.org/Second-Brain-Report/drug-addiction-2.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:54, 2 June 2017 (UTC)