Talk:Nimm von uns, Herr, du treuer Gott, BWV 101
Latest comment: 3 months ago by 750h+ in topic GA Review
 | Nimm von uns, Herr, du treuer Gott, BWV 101 has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: August 14, 2024. (Reviewed version). |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on August 13, 2024. |
 | A fact from Nimm von uns, Herr, du treuer Gott, BWV 101 appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 29 August 2011 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
GA Review
editThe following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Nimm von uns, Herr, du treuer Gott, BWV 101/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Gerda Arendt (talk · contribs) 11:13, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: 750h+ (talk · contribs) 07:57, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
Starting review. 750h+ 07:57, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
prose
editlead
editThe cantata belongs to Bach's chorale cantata cycle, the second cantata cycle during his tenure
i'd remove the second "cantana
history and words
editin the first performance of the cantata on 13
==> "in the first cantata performance on 13"- I tried "the cantata's first performance". --GA
- I remember that in the FAC of BWV 1, the repetition of "cantata" was criticized ;) - I tried by using the title once (but it is too long to do that often, and removed the one you pointed out, although I am not quite convinced that someone who never heard of Bach's cycles would immediately recognize what is meant. --GA
music
editThe orchestra, oboes and strings, plays in this cantata
"plays" should be "play"- The orchestra plays, but I dropped "orchestra", and tried to say what's unusual about that, please check. --GA
expanding each single line several new lines
add a "to" before several- I used "by", - please check ref Dellal, where the chorale lines are bold and the others not, to see if it could be explained better. I was quite surprised that the librettist sometimes added in the middle of a sentence. --GA
source and image review
edit- Images look good, mostly public domain, but there is an CC BY 2.5 image of an instrument. Sources look fine too. 750h+ 03:09, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- Image licenses are Chinese to me, can you explain, or could perhaps Dan help again, or could you fix something missing? --GA
- i don't see any problems with the image licensing. --750
- see how little I understand, - I though the abbr meant a problem --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:11, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- haha that's fine. 750h+ 08:48, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- i don't see any problems with the image licensing. --750
- Image licenses are Chinese to me, can you explain, or could perhaps Dan help again, or could you fix something missing? --GA
verdict
edit- @Gerda Arendt: happy to pass when all of these are addressed. 750h+ 03:09, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for reviewing! Replies point by point. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:27, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- Passing for GA 750h+ 08:48, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for reviewing! Replies point by point. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:27, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.