 | It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in London may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 19 December 2008. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Hi, a client of ours created this very entry and its completely accurate,we are very proud that someone took time to write all this. It's accuracy can be confirmed by visiting our website www.ninasvintageandretrohair.com.Its a pitty that someone thinks its rubbish if you google Nina's Hair Parlour you are going to be convinced otherwise.Thank you.
- The question is whether this page is anything beyond an advertisement, as would be appropriate on your parlour's webpage. If you already have your own webpage, it doesn't seem necessary to have one on Wikipedia. Unless, however, there is something here beyond an advertisement. For example, cited critical review, or other establishment of relevance. Note that once you have a wikipedia article you have little control over its content. Thanks for your input, and please sign your posts! Plastikspork (talk) 01:42, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
- Just to be clear, since my comments seem to be misinterpreted. I believe that simply having a webpage does not entitle a shop to its own article on wikipedia. My only concern is with the formatting and structure of the page since the notability is not clear enough as the article is currently written. I fully hope that someone who cares deeply about this article can take the time to restructure it to include things like lists of external references and/or citations. Thanks for your comments and help with making Wikipedia a better place. Plastikspork (talk) 23:59, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
Nina's Hair Parlour - more than just an advertisement
editNina's Hair Parlour is the FIRST of its kind. It is at the forefront of a movement. When all else follows and imitates this will be forgotten. You have Toni and Guy here / Trevor Sorbie /Vidal Sasoon - why are these not considered advertisements ... because it is seen as history. Just because this is history in the early stages does not make it any less valid. The parlour is at centre of the vintage 'revival' the burlesque scene and retro revival in London. If that is not a reason to be listed then you need to take another fashion icon frm wikipedia off too (ie Vivenne Westwood for being at the forefront of fashion at her time, etc) Julie Miranda —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.154.37.255 (talk) 09:54, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
- Sounds like it is notable and deserves its own page. Someone who cares deeply about the article should work to improve it. For example, it would be great to have a list of references, and external sources. Thanks for your input and making wikipedia better. Plastikspork (talk) 23:55, 23 December 2008 (UTC)