This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
She’s the Ambassador from Monsanto
edit“Oh great, our State Department is pushing G.M. food. She’s the Ambassador from Monsanto.” What’s your response?
Nina Fedoroff: How do I answer him? My answer is: There’s almost no food that isn’t genetically modified. Genetic modification is the basis of all evolution.
- http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/19/science/19conv.html?_r=1&oref=slogin —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.232.125.154 (talk) 16:11, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- So? What is wrong with her reply?SylviaStanley (talk) 10:33, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
Controversy
editFedoroff is considered a 'population alarmist' by some groups. She has been quoted as saying “humans had exceeded the Earth's ‘limits of sustainability’." A quote from a recent PRI (Population Research Institute)article follows:
"What about the 6.8 billion the world already supports? the BBC asked her. “There are probably already too many people on the planet," Fedoroff replied." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.139.40.170 (talk) 18:38, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
And this makes here a 'population alarmist'? What "groups"? 148.177.1.211 (talk) 13:22, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
External Links
editUpdated links 148.177.1.211 (talk) 13:23, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
Bibliography
editI have commenced a tidy-up of the Bibliography section using cite templates. Capitalization and punctuation follow standard cataloguing rules in AACR2 and RDA, as much as Wikipedia templates allow it. ISBNs and other persistent identifiers, where available, are commented out, but still available for reference. Feel free to continue. Sunwin1960 (talk) 06:21, 20 December 2016 (UTC)