Talk:Ninja Girls

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Malkinann in topic Unnotable reception

Review

edit

Unused reviews

edit

I'm unsure of the reliability of these sources. --Malkinann (talk) 12:14, 24 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Unnotable reception

edit

Comicbookbin.com's Leroy Douresseaux compares the tone of the manga to Strawberry 100%, and feels that the manga is full of "comic violence that is brutal and bloody or innuendo defined by female ninja (kunoichi) in some state of undress."[1] Activeanime.com's Davey C. Jones enjoyed the "voluptuous" character designs of the girls.[2] Matthew Alexander found the character of the spirit tablet imbued with the protagonist's mother's spirit to be very funny,[3] and found the protagonist to be a "likeable character" who "cares more about the feelings of those around him than he does about his own wellbeing".[4] Dan Polley felt the first volume had "potential", and that the secondary characters were intriguing.[5]

--94.246.150.68 (talk) 15:55, 5 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Do you know what it means to be unnoted?Bread Ninja (talk) 16:08, 5 February 2011 (UTC)Reply
Not notable outlets, I mean just some dudes from the internet. WP:RS, you know. --94.246.150.68 (talk) 18:17, 5 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:WikiProject Anime and manga/Online reliable sources should explain why each of those sources meets WP:RS. --Malkinann (talk) 03:24, 11 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. ^ "Ninja Girls: Volume 1". Comicbookbin.com. Retrieved 2010-06-03.
  2. ^ "NINJA GIRLS VOL. 1 | His, Ninja, Raizo, Her, Him". activeanime.com. 2009-09-10. Retrieved 2010-06-03.
  3. ^ "Ninja Girls Vol. #01". Mania.com. Retrieved 2010-06-03.
  4. ^ "Ninja Girls Vol. #02". Mania.com. Retrieved 2010-06-03.
  5. ^ "Ninja Girls Volume". Comics Village. Retrieved 2010-06-03.