Talk:Niranam Grandhavari
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Onel5969 in topic References/citations
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
References/citations
edit@Onel5969: Thank you for checking out this article. I have added further references as per your suggestion. Can you please take a look and suggest whether any further improvements are necessary? The subject of this article is a fairly well-known book in the geographical region where its language is spoken, and as the subject of the book itself is not of much significance to the general public, I have refrained from providing more description about the contents of the book than what the article currently has. Cheers.Swordofcherubim (talk) 04:31, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
- Swordofcherubim, Nice job. Assuming the 2nd paragraph in the Etymology section is covered by the same ref as the second paragraph, the only thing missing a ref now is the final assertion in the author section. Also, neither of the assertions in the lead is mentioned in the body of the article, and both those would need a footnote as well. Onel5969 TT me 10:36, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Onel5969: Makes sense. I had initially given reference to a range of pages regarding authorship in the 'Author' section, assuming that it would serve the final assertion as well in that section. In hindsight, that seems very vague. Now I have changed that to specify the exact page numbers, as well as complemented with additional reference from another source. Regarding the lead, I have modified it now to give specific footnotes for each assertion. Swordofcherubim (talk) 20:34, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
- Swordofcherubim, nice corrections. Keep up the good work. Onel5969 TT me 22:42, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Onel5969: Makes sense. I had initially given reference to a range of pages regarding authorship in the 'Author' section, assuming that it would serve the final assertion as well in that section. In hindsight, that seems very vague. Now I have changed that to specify the exact page numbers, as well as complemented with additional reference from another source. Regarding the lead, I have modified it now to give specific footnotes for each assertion. Swordofcherubim (talk) 20:34, 3 February 2021 (UTC)