Talk:Nitobe Inazō

Latest comment: 5 months ago by 104.232.119.107 in topic Controversial content


edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nitobe Inazō. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:32, 26 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Controversial content

edit

Hi @CurryTime7-24, this is @Toobigtokale. See my IP talk page for why I'm on an IP. As previously, I appreciate you challenging my work; the goal is to produce NPOV robust content. Still, I believe what I'm contributing is important and useful.

I'm running into edit conflicts; can I work on adding information to the article for a bit for now, and then you revise things later?

Also some side points I want to hash out:

  • Nitobe was a professor of colonialism; it does not seem a stretch to me to mention that he was pro-colonialism possibly in the lead. I will do more research in the body to make clear that this is more notable of a controversy than the article currently suggests.
  • Your edit comment about the Korean Wikipedia I don't agree with. Based on all Wikipedia policies/guidelines I've seen, all language Wikipedias are more than welcome to reflect information in any language source. While English sources are preferred for fact checking convenience, I've never seen that non-English perspectives are fundamentally second-class on the English Wikipedia.

104.232.119.107 (talk) 00:36, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

@CurryTime7-24 I think we should continue discussion about article here for sake of public viewing, concerns about my IP can be discussed on my IP talk page.
For others reading, there's some discussion of this article on my talk page, here 104.232.119.107 (talk) 03:04, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply