Talk:No. 10 (Inter-Allied) Commando

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on No. 10 (Inter-Allied) Commando. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101031231706/http://korpscommandotroepen.nl/index.php?l=en&p=42 to http://www.korpscommandotroepen.nl/index.php?l=en&p=42
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100113153252/http://home.online.no/~gestrom/history/n5t10frm.htm to http://home.online.no/~gestrom/history/n5t10frm.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:42, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

Merge from No. 2 Dutch Troop

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was to merge No. 2 Dutch Troop into No. 10 (Inter-Allied) Commando. Ckfasdf (talk) 07:41, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

---

I propose merging No. 2 Dutch Troop into No. 10 (Inter-Allied) Commando. I think the content in No. 2 Dutch Troop page simply too short (short text) per WP:MERGEREASON, and it can easily be included in No. 10 (Inter-Allied) Commando without cause any article-size or weighting problems.Ckfasdf (talk) 13:27, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

• Support. It will always be difficult for such a small unit to justify a separate article anyway and I don't think there is any reason that any troop cannot be covered in a couple of paragraphs on this main article. —Brigade Piron (talk) 12:01, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
• Support Just stumbled upon this, but after a quick look at the Dutch unit's article, I think it is easy to agree that it should be merged with this article.EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 18:01, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
•  Done Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:57, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

First reference to No 3 (X) Troop

The entry notes that “ James Leasor first revealed the existence of X-Troop in 1980 in his book, The Unknown Warrior,[16][a]”; the existence of No 3 Troop is referred to in the 1971 edition of the Alpine Journal in its obituary of Bryan Hilton-Jones. http://www.alpinejournal.org.uk/Contents/Contents_1971_files/AJ%201971%20322-339%20In%20Memoriam.pdf Droid45 (talk) 11:30, 13 April 2024 (UTC)