Talk:No. 204 Squadron RAF
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Copyvio
editCopyright problem removed
editPrior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.rafweb.org/Sqn201-205.htm. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Nigel Ish (talk) 19:51, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
- The offending text, which is a very close paraphrase of the source website, but with cites to different sources added, was added here on 28 February 2010. I've checked on the internet archive, and the rafweb.org content precedes the addition to this page - see here dated 12 February 2010.Nigel Ish (talk) 19:57, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
Commanding Officers
editIs the list of COs really notable, none of them are individually notable. I would suggest as a general idea that the list could be reduced to only those with related articles, which in this case means it could be deleted. It is available through the refs and external links if anybody is really interested. MilborneOne (talk) 21:37, 28 December 2012 (UTC)