Talk:No. 421 (Reconnaissance) Flight RAF
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the No. 421 (Reconnaissance) Flight RAF article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
 | It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in England may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
References for source material for 421 Flight article
editMattbryantuk
I'd like to say that this is an excellently written article, and from the degree of specialist knowledge I have about it, it should score highly on accuracy. Would it be possible please for you to cite your source material in References and Citations? It seems that if you don't, there's a danger that the article will be removed, which would be a great pity. The only other source material I'm aware of for 421 Flight is a lengthy and well-researched article in Aviation News in October 1984, a copy of which I have in my possession but I haven't had time at present to go back to this and add anything from it.
Regards,
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on No. 421 (Reconnaissance) Flight RAF. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20080325212017/http://www.kbobm.org:80/index.htm to http://www.kbobm.org/index.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:10, 21 July 2016 (UTC)