Talk:No. 6 Squadron RAAF/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk • contribs • count) 00:43, 12 September 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

Nicely done.

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

   Can you identify which destroyer was damaged in August '42? Try [1]

I can narrow it down to one of three destroyers (Arashi, Yayoi and Murakumo), but the Japanese official history says that they didn't sustain any damage in the attack, and combinedfleet.com also doesn't record any damage. I've tweaked the wording of the article to reflect this discrepancy. Thanks a lot for your comments. Nick-D (talk) 08:24, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

1. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

2. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

3. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

4. Overall:

   Pass or Fail: