Talk:No Innocent Victim
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright violation
editA (manual) reversion was undertaken on this article because the version as of 02:52, 9 May 2006 (UTC) was a WP:COPYVIO, a copy of
The WP:COPYVIO was introduced in the 6 April 2006 edit by 68.158.188.226 (talk · contribs).
66.167.253.177 02:52, 9 May 2006 (UTC).
I believe Pennywise is originally from Hermosa Beach not San Diego. This should be changed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.27.26.96 (talk • contribs)
Christian hardcore VS CHRISTIAN hardcore
editSo i think this band is Christian Hardcore rather than Christian hardcore the first is a hardcore punk band who are christian like these, or Comeback Kid and the latter is bands that play Christian hardcore, a genre of music, not sure what examples they are for that.
Their lyrics are not openly christian and not too different from non christian bands in their genre, they confine too much to secular music to qualify as a christian band in terms of genre.
- MATTHEW
Removal of memberlist
editSo, Walter, I see you have removed the memberlist a second time, even though the material was not added by Metalworker14; in this case, I restored information that was on the page before he even discovered it. I also notice that you did not remove any names from the inbox, nor did you remove bandmember names from the body of the text. Is your intent to question the validity of the information regarding who played what instrument? Why is this information considered controversial or uncertain for this band, in particular? Chubbles (talk) 15:07, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
- So Chubbles I see you have complained again even though it clearly fails WP:V. It's instruments and date ranges. Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:34, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
- Who played what instrument is not typically even remotely controversial or problematic in terms of verifiability. Date ranges are somewhat more reasonable on that score, but we'd be failing to provide even the most basic information about a band if we did not have any indication of who played what, and almost every band publishes this information in the liner notes of its albums. Chubbles (talk) 05:46, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
- You're right it's not typically controversial, but it's also not verified. Walter Görlitz (talk) 07:10, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
- That's exactly what I'm wondering. If it's not reasonably subject to debate or uncertainty, why is verification being demanded nevertheless? We do not, as a rule, remove all unverified material from Wikipedia; we remove all unverifiable material. If there's reason to be genuinely suspicious that there might be something incorrect about what was listed in terms of instrumentation, then I get the action completely. But this is the second time I've seen this stuff get removed without any indication of that, which makes it look more like making a point for its own sake. Chubbles (talk) 14:23, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
- Because the editor who initially added the information is known to add unsourced information. The editor has in the past added date ranges for former members using a question mark as an end date. The editor does not know nor is the addition of content verifiable. He gleans his information from unreliable sources. Sorry you feel it's POINTy. It's based on WP:V. Get the editor blocked and I'll be less strict on that policy. Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:35, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
- The material I restored was not added by Metalworker14, as I noted in my first post here on this talk page. It was on the page before that editor arrived here. Chubbles (talk) 20:42, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
- I stand corrected. Your edit. MW's edits: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]. He added the grammatically annoying "ex-" to identify musicians with affiliations with other bands and made other edits, most notably to the timeline. Thanks for being persistent and making it clear what the problem was. Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:09, 25 March 2016 (UTC)`
- The material I restored was not added by Metalworker14, as I noted in my first post here on this talk page. It was on the page before that editor arrived here. Chubbles (talk) 20:42, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
- Because the editor who initially added the information is known to add unsourced information. The editor has in the past added date ranges for former members using a question mark as an end date. The editor does not know nor is the addition of content verifiable. He gleans his information from unreliable sources. Sorry you feel it's POINTy. It's based on WP:V. Get the editor blocked and I'll be less strict on that policy. Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:35, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
- That's exactly what I'm wondering. If it's not reasonably subject to debate or uncertainty, why is verification being demanded nevertheless? We do not, as a rule, remove all unverified material from Wikipedia; we remove all unverifiable material. If there's reason to be genuinely suspicious that there might be something incorrect about what was listed in terms of instrumentation, then I get the action completely. But this is the second time I've seen this stuff get removed without any indication of that, which makes it look more like making a point for its own sake. Chubbles (talk) 14:23, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
- You're right it's not typically controversial, but it's also not verified. Walter Görlitz (talk) 07:10, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
- Who played what instrument is not typically even remotely controversial or problematic in terms of verifiability. Date ranges are somewhat more reasonable on that score, but we'd be failing to provide even the most basic information about a band if we did not have any indication of who played what, and almost every band publishes this information in the liner notes of its albums. Chubbles (talk) 05:46, 24 March 2016 (UTC)