Talk:No Surrender (2005)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: wna247 (talk · contribs)

Hello, I will be reviewing this article and let the nominator know what needs to be improved if needed. GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality: (Well written from a neutral standpoint.)

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists: (Everything is fine.)

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources: (All the sources provide reliable info confirming what is mentioned in the article.)

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: (Every paragraph has a reliable source/reference that is related to the topic.)

   C. No original research: (No original research found.)

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects: (Covers all the details prior, during, and after the event.)

   B. Focused: (Always stays on topic.)

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias: (No obvious bias found.)

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc: (Took a look at the article history everything is fine as there has been no previous edit wars etc.)

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: (All the images are properly sourced and copyrighted. Non-free images are fair use.)

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: (Captions and pictures are appropriate to the article)

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail: Very good article, I have passed this article as a good article as it meets Good Article Criteria. However if the nominee or anyone else would like to add further information to the article please do but bare in mind it must be referenced. --