| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that an image or photograph of Noah Musingku be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
File:Two kings.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion
edit
|
An image used in this article, File:Two kings.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 22 May 2012
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Two kings.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 10:25, 23 May 2012 (UTC) |
CSD note
editPlease see Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Noah_Musingku which brought attention to this article. It appears to be an attack-only page with no reliable sources. Zad68 19:26, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
(reply to deleted post)
- "Con man" is a contentious claim. For it to be in the lede requires strong sourcing per WP:BLP. Such sourcing is not apparent here. Is there a need for the lede to call him a "con man"? Collect (talk) 18:23, 14 December 2012 (UTC)