Talk:Noble Consort Wen
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:19, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
"Noble Consort Mei" listed at Redirects for discussion
edit
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Noble Consort Mei and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 18#Noble Consort Mei until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 12:53, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Shouldn't Noble Consort Wen be moved back to Noble Consort Mei?
editHello. Why has page Noble Consort Mei in 2022 been moved to Noble Consort Wen? [1]. In Draft History of Qing published by Zhonghua her name is 玫 (mei), not 玟 (wen); So the name 玫 (mei) is actually sourced, But is the move of page Noble Consort Mei to Noble Consort Wen sourced also? The only reason I could find for this movement is given by user RealAccount3008: Her actual honorary title is generally accepted to be Wen, not Mei although the characters look similar[2]. But this seems an unsourced remark. Is there an accessible historical source which confirms her honorary title is generally accepted Wen? And if there isn't shouldn't the title of the page be moved back to Noble Consort Mei? I'm just wondering, sincerely, Guss (talk) 11:05, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Deidonata, Deidonata, Chylsee, and Retrieverlove: courtesy ping, as you have all made significant contributions to the article in the past, and may have valuable insights. effeietsanders 16:16, 3 October 2024 (UTC)