Talk:Nobody but Me (Michael Bublé album)

Latest comment: 7 years ago by JudgeRM in topic Requested move 8 January 2017

I just wanted to mention that the vinyl LP version's track listing for this album doesn't match the "Standard version" listed in the article. Track 1 on the LP is is Track 3 in the listing, Track 5 on the LP is Track 1. Track 9 on the LP is called "This Love of Mine" and Track 10 on the LP is Track 9. However I am unsure how to edit the page to reflect this / add a new section.RanaChakra (talk) 13:19, 5 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 25 October 2016

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Closing early since WP:PRECISE clearly applies due to unnecessary extra disambiguation in the title and nothing to disambiguate against. (Unreal7, this move could have been requested via WP:RMTR.) (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 22:45, 25 October 2016 (UTC)Reply


Nobody but Me (Michael Bublé album)Nobody but Me (album) – No other album called Nobody but Me. Unreal7 (talk) 14:14, 25 October 2016 (UTC)Reply


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 8 January 2017

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (non-admin closure) JudgeRM (talk to me) 16:34, 15 January 2017 (UTC)Reply


– From 1 July 2015 until 19 August 2016 (the day before the album's article was created), the other two topics had 22,849 views combined.[1] Since 20 August 2016, the album's article (and other variations of it) have received 127,698 views.[2] Even if its sales quickly fade, it will still be far more noteworthy than either of the songs. Unreal7 (talk) 13:52, 8 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

What is this fixation with Google Books, IIO? They have chosen what they want, as shown by the stats I provided. Unreal7 (talk) 16:16, 9 January 2017 (UTC)Reply
wikt:fixation, this sounds like personal attack language. Please cut it out. A deliberate ambiguation of an article title requires a demonstration of long term encyclopedic significance more than all other articles combined. One way we assess that is looking in WP:RS. You have failed to address this. In ictu oculi (talk) 23:29, 9 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Orphaned references in Nobody but Me (album)

edit

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Nobody but Me (album)'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "bpi":

  • From Michael Bublé discography: "BPI Certified Awards". British Phonographic Industry. Retrieved 2016-12-15.
  • From All I Want for Christmas Is You: "BPI - Certified Awards". British Phonographic Industry. Archived from the original on January 17, 2010. Retrieved August 13, 2010. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 19:42, 10 January 2017 (UTC)Reply