Talk:Non-compromised Pendulum

Notability

I have struggled with this one as to whether I think it's notable or not as it seems to make reasonable claims but then what I find are press releases or blurbs given to the book itself. Vincent60030 you decided to accept. What pushed it over the edge for you? Also pinging the author as well as some who considered this at AfC. @Legacypac, Velella, JC7V7DC5768, Aspireforintelligence, and 124Sanroque: Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 03:54, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

It was a struggle for me too, but what pushed me to give a green light was that the sources were verifiable. The article still can be expanded so I don’t see how it is like an ordinary book.VKZY^LUFan (talk) (Mind the Gap!) 04:01, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

Every topic around this one, from the boxing style to the writer to the commentators are notable. I know notability is not WP:NOTINHERITED but still. This would likely survive an AfD. Legacypac (talk) 04:03, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

Barkeep49, I didn't review the draft. I just gave advice to the author since he/she was asking other reviewers to review the draft instead of waiting for it to be reviewed. I was on the fence about the draft and even if I was going to accept it, i couldn't since it was moved protected at the time (it expired November 13 2018). JC7V (talk) 04:11, 25 November 2018 (UTC)