Talk:Nordhordland Bridge

Nordhordland Bridge has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 4, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on January 29, 2011.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the Nordhordland Bridge (pictured), designed by Aas-Jakobsen, has no lateral anchorage because of the depth of Salhusfjorden?

Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on September 22, 2011, September 22, 2014, September 22, 2016, and September 22, 2022.

Norway

	Norway portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Bridges and Tunnels Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Longest laterally-unsupported span in the world?

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The article currently claims that the bridge has "the longest laterally-unsupported span in the world". I cannot find any sources for this, however I cannot confirm that this is untrue. If anyone can find a reliable source for this bit of information, feel free to readd it. Arsenikk ^(talk) 21:31, 17 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

Latest comment: 13 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Nordhordland Bridge/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 18:15, 4 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found.

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 18:16, 4 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
I made a number of minor copy-edits.[1]

Complies sufficiently with the MoS, prose is reasonably good.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
Well referenced, assume good faith for off-line and Norwegian language sources. Those that I did access supported the cited statements.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
Thorough, with unnecessary detail.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
NPOV
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
Stable
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Suitably licensed and captioned, I love the picture of the bridge in fog.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
An interesting article, I had not realised pontoon bridges of such size had been constructed. I am happy to list as GA. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 18:41, 4 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for taking the time to review the article :) Arsenikk ^(talk) 19:53, 4 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Add topic