This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Health Service, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.National Health ServiceWikipedia:WikiProject National Health ServiceTemplate:WikiProject National Health ServiceNational Health Service articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Social Work, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Social Work on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Social WorkWikipedia:WikiProject Social WorkTemplate:WikiProject Social WorkSocial work articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject East Anglia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of East Anglia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.East AngliaWikipedia:WikiProject East AngliaTemplate:WikiProject East AngliaEast Anglia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
An IP editor has repeatedly reinserted a 'controversies' section, which I have now twice removed (diff) as not being of significance to this particular article. The fact that a nurse got an unpleasant note from a neighbour at her home - as unpleasant as it is - is quite irrelevant to this particular Hospital Trust. I don't object to a deprecated, unreliable source like the Daily Mail being used as I'm sure the story is true; I just object to this single relatively trivial news story being added as if it were of significance to an article about the person's employer.
I propose to remove the content once again and, before I do, ask interested editors to express their views here first to gain consensus. Nick Moyes (talk) 14:50, 12 April 2020 (UTC)Reply