This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 00:19, December 8, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I understand that articles about people who have passed on to the afterlife describe them such: "x was the y"; also, article about people whose function which made them article-worthy in first place is a former function are described as "x is a former y" (e.g. athlete). In the opening paragraph of this article, there is the combination "was the former": I understand that this means that he has passed on, but also that he was retired before he passed on, because I'm familiar with customary WP expressions. However, I think it's a little misleading when read at face-value (He isn't the former chairman anymore? Maybe he is the chairman again?), and also quite uncommon. I think normally, articles are reverted from "is the former y" to "was y" at the person's death. Don Ecchi (talk) 08:29, 16 November 2021 (UTC)Reply