Talk:Normandie-class battleship

(Redirected from Talk:Normandie class battleship)
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Parsecboy in topic Harvard error
Featured articleNormandie-class battleship is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Good topic starNormandie-class battleship is part of the Battleships of France series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 9, 2012Good article nomineeListed
May 23, 2019WikiProject A-class reviewApproved
August 25, 2019Featured article candidatePromoted
August 25, 2020Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Featured article

Unusual?

edit

Are you sure that the hybrid steam-turbine/triple-expansion engine thing was really "unusual"? I've heard of that being used on a number of ships, notably the Titanic (in that case, the turbine ran off the exhaust steam from the reciprocating engines, which were the main engines). Perhaps it's unusual for a combat ship, but I don't think it's by any means "unusual" as far as engine layouts in general go. It's simply a way to give good low-speed cruising (where turbines suffer from poor efficiency), while giving you a reserve of power from a high speed turbine for dashes when the rare occasion calls for maximum speed at the cost of high fuel consumption..45Colt 02:07, 17 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Yes, it's unusual for warships - no other contemporary capital ship design used a hybrid system. Parsecboy (talk) 10:58, 17 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Image from Russian article

edit

Based on scetch in Jordan, John. Dumas, Robert. French Battleships 1922-1956. — Barnsley, Yorkshire: Seaforth Publishing, 2009. — 224 p. — ISBN 978-1848320345 & original draw of Langedok from french arhiv

 
Normandie-class battleship

--Maxrossomachin (talk) 15:59, 7 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for pointing it out, I've replaced the old Brassey's linedrawing with this one. Parsecboy (talk) 16:07, 7 April 2015 (UTC)Reply
There are some more pics. We are working on Russian good article. Check the Commons category. --Maxrossomachin (talk) 20:39, 7 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Citation bot denied access

edit

I've disabled citation bot until I find out why publisher data is being removed from one journal citation.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 11:56, 28 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Gallica

edit

@Parsecboy: Are any of the images found in this Gallica search of use to this article? https://gallica.bnf.fr/services/engine/search/sru?operation=searchRetrieve&version=1.2&startRecord=0&maximumRecords=15&page=1&query=%28gallica%20all%20%22Normandie%22%29&filter=dc.type%20all%20%22image%22%20and%20century%20all%20%2220%22 Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.7% of all FPs 21:16, 14 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Parsecboy: In particular, note the following: Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.7% of all FPs 21:34, 14 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Odd angles, but interesting:

Note I only searched Normandie. Searching the other ships' names (with only 20th-century publication date and only images as results) may gain other useful images. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.7% of all FPs 21:38, 14 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, Adam, but you have to be careful to avoid the passenger liner Normandie, which was a near-contempory.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:19, 14 June 2019 (UTC)Reply
That sounds horribly annoying. I take it all of those are the passenger liner? Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.7% of all FPs 03:40, 15 June 2019 (UTC)Reply
All the ones that I checked. But I'll do searches for the other ships of the class, which will have fewer false positives.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 04:46, 15 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Harvard error

edit

Note 3 has a Harvard error because it doesn't include the year. Is it citing Preston 1972 or Preston 2002? AmericanLemming (talk) 19:14, 3 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Fixed, thanks for pointing it out. Parsecboy (talk) 19:26, 3 September 2019 (UTC)Reply