Talk:North Carolina–NC State rivalry/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions about North Carolina–NC State rivalry. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
SB Race, Chickwak loss
Note to self: Will add a bit about the NC State Student Body president race later. Summary: Chickwak is clearly leading and looks like he's going to win, then someone finds evidence that he is a Carolina fan and he promptly looses by one of the greatest margins ever seen. Classic. theanphibian 03:30, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
Sidney Lowe's illness
Sidney Lowe: 1-2*
- At the February 21, 2007 game, Sidney Lowe was rushed to the hospital due to a dehydration as a result of the flu at halftime. Assistant coach Monte Towe filled in for Lowe for the second half, but the loss is still accredited to Lowe's record.
this how lowe's record was
Sidney Lowe: 1-2 that is how it is currently. Is it worthy of putting an astrice or not i vote yes AceKingQueenJack 00:53, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- If this is the only time a coach has left a UNC-NCSU game, then I say yes. If it's not unusual, then no. --TinMan 01:17, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- I say definitely no. To repeat what I said when removing the original qualification: though he wasn't present the entire game, the results still represent a loss during his tenure as head coach. It's still part of the "Sidney Lowe era" and that's what the record should represent. And as Ebtunc2006 noted with his edit, coaches ejected from games are still counted with the loss. I understand that the circumstances are a little different because Lowe left through no fault of his own, but the principle is the same.--Benstrider 03:47, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- Has any ejection/removal/leaving/teleporting happened in the NCSU/UNC game past though? I personally don't know. It's an article on the rivalry, so any unique contributing factors may be interesting. Maybe not as a sidenote disputing the record though. I agree, Lowe was still considered "head coach"; there was just a fill-in. --TinMan 04:08, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- I say definitely no. To repeat what I said when removing the original qualification: though he wasn't present the entire game, the results still represent a loss during his tenure as head coach. It's still part of the "Sidney Lowe era" and that's what the record should represent. And as Ebtunc2006 noted with his edit, coaches ejected from games are still counted with the loss. I understand that the circumstances are a little different because Lowe left through no fault of his own, but the principle is the same.--Benstrider 03:47, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
Where's Football?
this article is soley about basketball. Football stats should be added too. --AceKingQueenJack 14:04, 20 January 2007 (UTC) 01:17, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
Overall record
The breakdowns into different categories is nice, but nowhere does the article mention the total series record. Adding up the records given by decade gives an overall total of UNC 133, NCSU 75. Can anyone confirm that this is correct and includes all meeting between these two teams? Benstrider 19:49, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
There needs to be somewhere where you show what the numbers mean. Are they ACC records? Overall records? Game scores? That needs to be shown... and preferably not in so much a list. Plus, there should be some dates behind these records. --TinMan 03:42, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
Logos
the logo nazis are out . . .calling logos on rivaly pages "decorative". I disagree, but if they are identifued as illustrative and not decorative maybe we can keep them all . . .72.0.36.36 03:45, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- Go figure... oh well, if it must be, it must be. --Triadian 02:54, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Interlocking NC Blue.gif
Image:Interlocking NC Blue.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:00, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Tarhell.PNG
Image:Tarhell.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Requested move
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was move. JPG-GR (talk) 05:43, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
NC State-UNC rivalry → Carolina-NC State rivalry — The UNC-Duke rivalry page has just been moved to Carolina-Duke rivalry after discussion and I'm suggesting this page should be moved to match. My rational is that the athletic teams are more commonly referred to Carolina and NC State (or State) in this context and it is not ambiguous. The ordering of the school names would be alphabetical. —Yellowspacehopper (talk) 04:42, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
Survey
- Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with
*'''Support'''or*'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
- Support Yellowspacehopper (talk) 04:43, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
Discussion
- Any additional comments:
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Requested move
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was move (again). JPG-GR (talk) 05:16, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
NC State-North Carolina Rivalry → Carolina-NC State rivalry — Back to the consensus title that matches the Carolina-Duke rivalry naming scheme. As agreed previously "Carolina" is unambiguous in this context. — Rameses The Ram (talk) 21:05, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
Survey
- Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with
*'''Support'''or*'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
- Support as nominator. Rameses The Ram (talk) 21:05, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
Discussion
- Any additional comments:
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.