Talk:North Transfer Station
Latest comment: 4 years ago by SounderBruce in topic GA Review
 | North Transfer Station has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: March 11, 2020. (Reviewed version). |
 | A fact from North Transfer Station appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 4 March 2020, and was viewed approximately 3,608 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:26, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
( )
- ... that North Seattle's waste transfer station has a viewing room and a playground? Source: Seattle DJC and SPU
- ALT1:... that North Seattle's waste transfer station has a green roof, solar panels, and skylights? Source: The Seattle Times
- Reviewed: Milk War
Moved to mainspace by SounderBruce (talk). Self-nominated at 18:50, 11 February 2020 (UTC).
New article and it is long enough, no copyvios, the hook is interesting and is cited to the DJC. All that's needed is QPQ. Mccunicano☕️ 06:12, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Mccunicano: QPQ added. SounderBruce 07:43, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
Great. I amended my original comment for talking about the wrong source, but the playground hook seems interesting considering its a waste facility. Mccunicano☕️ 10:52, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
GA Review
editThe following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:North Transfer Station/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Nova Crystallis (talk · contribs) 01:24, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Why not. Nova Crystallis (Talk) 01:24, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
- I know it's complete, but is it operating?
- Fixed.
- I haven't gone through the article yet but I can see the lead is a bit lacking. Maybe you need to add some history to it.
- Could add some more building features too.
- Expanded lead.
- Could add some more building features too.
- "Community amenities, including the plaza and public artwork, were installed in March 2016 while work continued inside the buildings to install electrical and HVAC systems" Comma after 2016?
- Or split the sentences to include the progress for each building instead.
- Rewrote and split the sentence.
- AGF on offline sources.
What a dump. Nova Crystallis (Talk) 06:06, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Nova Crystallis: All done. Thanks for the review. SounderBruce 22:18, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Dashes
editI made an adjustment to the dashes used between numbers per the policy at MOS:ENTO. Hyphens are used for compound words, etc. But dashes are always used for figures or to represent the word "through."--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 22:56, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Esprit15d: The page number is literally "3-19". It's how government documents are typically formatted, so please use the script with more care. SounderBruce 22:59, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- I'm not willing to fight about it, so I won't push it further, but I literally cited the Wikipedia policy, which you have seemed to ignore. Also, that's not how hyphens are used even outside of Wikipedia. The endash is used for value ranges.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 23:05, 7 March 2020 (UTC)