Talk:North West 200
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
1958 Race Shell-Mex film
editThere's a Shell-Mex film of the 1958 North West 200 race that was used as a Trade test colour films on YouTube here: [23] that someone might find useful, if only for nostalgia's sake. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.4.57.101 (talk) 18:46, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
Violaton of 3RR rule
editMight I suggest, Intimidator, that you self-revert your last edit, since you are in violation of the WP:3RR rule? Failure to do so might result in your being blocked from editing. The edit is uncited. Any uncited information, as per wiki guidelines, can be deleted by any editor. Your incivility in your response also is frowned upon by wiki guidelines. Take care. Onel5969 (talk) 01:49, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
- I needed two reverts to get you started talking what your problem is. And then you asked for a reference that already was in the article for the whole time. So what reaction do you expect?--Intimidator (talk) 08:58, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
- While there are exceptions for violating the 3RR rule, lack of understanding is not one of them. I clearly gave you my reason after your first revert - uncited. You ignored that, or did not understand that, and reverted again. So I gave you an expanded answer after your second revert. Yet you still reverted, in violation of the 3RR rule, and were uncivil in doing so. The place to elicit conversation is not in the edit summary, but in here on the talk page. Which I did. You still have not self-reverted, and I suggest that you do so, since you are still in violation of the 3RR rule. Onel5969 (talk) 12:40, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
- OK, I have now seen where you wrote uncited for the first time. I haven't seen this yet, my fault. But when you wrote uncited the source which references the chapter of Simon Andrews was already in the article. So what is your point now? Why should I remove this sourced paragraph?--Intimidator (talk) 13:51, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
- While there are exceptions for violating the 3RR rule, lack of understanding is not one of them. I clearly gave you my reason after your first revert - uncited. You ignored that, or did not understand that, and reverted again. So I gave you an expanded answer after your second revert. Yet you still reverted, in violation of the 3RR rule, and were uncivil in doing so. The place to elicit conversation is not in the edit summary, but in here on the talk page. Which I did. You still have not self-reverted, and I suggest that you do so, since you are still in violation of the 3RR rule. Onel5969 (talk) 12:40, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on North West 200. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090523234216/http://www.lastingtribute.co.uk:80/tribute/young/3080145 to http://www.lastingtribute.co.uk/tribute/young/3080145
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:03, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on North West 200. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100311230611/http://www.northwest200.org/history.aspx to http://www.northwest200.org/history.aspx
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100520080114/http://www.northwest200.org/news_article/103.aspx to http://www.northwest200.org/news_article/103.aspx
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120317170405/http://www.northwest200.org/news_article_name/relentless-international-north-west-200-revs-up-for-giant-2012.aspx to http://www.northwest200.org/news_article_name/relentless-international-north-west-200-revs-up-for-giant-2012.aspx
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721183346/http://www.northwest200.org/news_article/94.aspx to http://www.northwest200.org/news_article/94.aspx
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100520080120/http://www.northwest200.org/news_article/114.aspx to http://www.northwest200.org/news_article/114.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:51, 2 December 2017 (UTC)