Talk:Northern War of 1655–1660/GA1
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Jezhotwells in topic GA Review
GA Review
editArticle (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: –– Jezhotwells (talk) 20:08, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
Toolbox |
---|
I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.
Disambiguations: I could not determine the correct target for Frederick of Hesse, all the Wikipedia articles are about later Fredericks. I fixed all others. diff
Link rot: No dead links.
Checking against GA criteria
edit- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- The article is well referenced, I assume good faith for the sources, which all appear reliable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- Thorough and focussed, giving an overviewe without too much intricate detail.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- I am very happy to pass this as a good article. Congratulations! I shall leave you decide what to do about Frederick of Hess. Perhaps there is not an artcile on this particular noble. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 21:10, 12 April 2010 (UTC)