Talk:Norwood–205th Street station
Norwood–205th Street station has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on August 14, 2016. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the New York City Subway stations of Flushing–Main Street and Norwood–205th Street both have provisions for unbuilt subway extensions? |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Norwood – 205th Street (IND Concourse Line)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Carbrera (talk · contribs) 19:16, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
Infobox
edit- You can remove any of the following parameters that will remain empty:
- "lat min"
- "lat sec"
- "lon min"
- "lon sec"
Lead
edit- Great prose here!
History
editParagraph 2
edit- "On August 23, 1954, a D train relaying east of the station overshot the bumper blocks at the end of the track, crashing into the wall at the end of the line." --> No source.
- Done by Kew Gardens 613. Kylo, Rey, & Finn Consortium, now featuring BB-8 (talk) 13:33, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
Station layout
editParagraph 1
edit- "This underground station has two tracks and one island platform." --> No source.
- "Both track walls have a lime green trim line with a medium Kelly green border." --> No source.
- "Small "205" signs are placed below them at regular intervals." --> No source.
- All of these have been Done by Kew Gardens 613. Kylo, Rey, & Finn Consortium, now featuring BB-8 (talk) 13:33, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
- Or are References 13, 14, 17, and 18 meant for all of the aforementioned information?
- Rest is fantastic!
End of GA Review:
editExcellent writing style, just a few questions regarding sourcing and etc. On hold for seven days to allow for changes. Thanks! Cheers, Carbrera (talk) 03:20, 30 June 2016 (UTC).
- @Carbrera: Thanks for the review. I think everything is OK now that Kew Gardens has fixed all of these issues. On the topic of sourcing, I believe references 13, 14, 17, and 18 could also apply to the station layout. Regards, Kylo, Rey, & Finn Consortium, now featuring BB-8 (talk) 13:33, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
Move discussion in progress
editThere is a move discussion in progress on Talk:163rd Street–Amsterdam Avenue (IND Eighth Avenue Line) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 17:32, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Norwood–205th Street (IND Concourse Line). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160925201747/http://gothamist.com/2004/08/05/the_citys_dirty_and_clean_subway_stations.php to http://gothamist.com/2004/08/05/the_citys_dirty_and_clean_subway_stations.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:26, 3 November 2017 (UTC)