Untitled

edit

I have to say, I thought about editing this page but I don't know where to begin. I think the majority of this needs a total re-write. Does anyone else agree, at least, that the year by year history of the group should stay on their website and not wikipedia? Jscg (talk) 19:22, 22 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

The whole article is a joke and note "noteworthy" at all. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.104.40.43 (talk) 06:06, 8 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Looks interesting to me. Relates to history and music. Charles Edwin Shipp (talk) 03:15, 28 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

I've begun the daunting task of neutralizing the article. I've gotten through some but not all yet. If I do it successfully, can I delete the nominations at the top of the page, or does someone else have to? I'm kinda new at this. Rosagardner (talk) 06:22, 28 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi, I recently cleaned this articles external links section in accordance with our guidelines and there were some reliable sources that didn't belong there, but they could help for anyone who wants to expand the article. I'll leave them here for easy reference if someone wants to use them for citations.

ThemFromSpace 06:36, 14 February 2010 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Noteworthy (vocal group). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:05, 1 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Noteworthy (vocal group). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:30, 25 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Revamp

edit

This article needs a serious revamp. Poor organization, unsourced info, and unreliable/non-existent citations are this articles main problems. I will be removing unsourced information if I cannot find a reliable citation to support it and will be improving prose to be Wikipedia approved, academic and non-promotional as well as improving the organization to that of Vocal Point. A lot of information needs to be trimmed out. The page is longer than VP, even though VP is objectively a more popular and well-known a capella group. I wanted any curious users or editors to be aware of these changes and my intentions to make a factual, reliable, and concise article. I welcome any help as always. Thanks! Skyes(BYU) (talk) 22:50, 16 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi there! To any and all interested: I've proposed a WikiProject dedicated to a cappella. This would be a group of editors interested in improving the quality of articles related to a cappella. If you're passionate about a cappella—ranging from the Pentatonix to collegiate a cappella groups like Noteworthy, or perhaps pop culture representations like Pitch Perfect and The Sing-Off—please check out the proposal and share your thoughts!

Here's a link to the proposal for WikiProject A Cappella.

If you could see yourself contributing to an article related to a cappella (like this one), please consider joining!

Shrinkydinks (talk) 06:13, 6 December 2019 (UTC)Reply