Talk:Now (newspaper)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Disambig
editThere's a huge magazine in the UK with the same name. Much bigger than this rag. You need a disambig page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.134.61.83 (talk) 03:16, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:NOW in flat circle.gif
editImage:NOW in flat circle.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Fair use rationale for Image:Nowcover1.PNG
editImage:Nowcover1.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
NOW vs Now
editI notice that this article was originally named NOW, but was moved per naming conventions. I don't see anything that should have warranted the move. I think the correct name of this publication is NOW, all caps. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 22:56, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
Almost entirely unsourced
editI cleaned up the external links in the body and in the external links section as well as some other cleanup.
Almost none of the content of this article is sourced. The Straight article is quite short and described one incident (and the URL had gone stale). I have tagged it with {{refimprove}} and left this explanation, since I'm now out of time to do more. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 07:08, 25 September 2018 (UTC)