Talk:Nuclear Strike (Spooks)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ruby2010 talk 04:13, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

I will review sometime later today or tomorrow. Ruby2010 talk 04:13, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Comments

• The character did not say a word throughout the entirety of the episode, yet has such a strong presence, which the producers felt was unique for a guest star in the series. I think the sentence has some tense issues. Did you mean he had such a strong presence? And make it more clear that it was the producers who felt he had the strong presence.
• When Sam Miller called Cross about the development, the writer included as a last minute addition to the script, and the sequence was shot the next day. I think there's a word missing.
• There are two disambiguation links that need to be fixed.

• I made a few minor corrections myself, and everything else looks great. Just address the concerns above, and it will be good to go. Thanks, Ruby2010 talk 16:28, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Done. -- Matthew RD 21:39, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Looks good. Pass for GA. Nice work, Ruby2010 talk 22:27, 23 March 2011 (UTC)