This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I don't think the reasoning was as given here. Midgley (talk) 14:43, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, this seems muddled. Popular Mechanics is not a good source for nuclear physics - it got things confused. The concept is real and affected planning. I'll try to clean up the article. Anders Sandberg (talk) 09:29, 12 April 2014 (UTC)