Talk:Nuclear power in Turkey

Naming

There is a discussion which is also related to this article or category. You are welcome to take a part of this discussion. Beagel (talk) 15:43, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

search plants

There are 2 Offical and five or four civil (University) searching plants.Here is a link that open TAEK's page that about searching plants. http://www.taek.gov.tr/eng/cnaem.html http://www.taek.gov.tr/eng/sanaem.html 20:11, 18 November 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.216.214.62 (talk)

Google maps

How comes there is no construction site visible at Google satellite? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:C22:D100:3800:F45C:9FB:9585:5AEE (talk) 09:38, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

You mean Google Earth? It is at https://earth.google.com/web/search/+Akkuyu/@36.1425853,33.53934607,6.32196437a,3977.66432128d,35y,-0h,0t,0r/data=CigiJgokCWvowQcz9ENAEXU6DHGS8UNAGeHQQ6O8YkBAIaonmRJaXUBA Chidgk1 (talk) 20:16, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

Merger proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was not to merge. Chidgk1 (talk) 15:55, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

---

I propose merging Akkuyu Nuclear Power Plant into Nuclear power in Turkey because:

1) I will be very surprised if a second nuclear plant is ever built in Turkey.

2) I am considering improving this article to "good" standard and that would be easier if the articles were merged.

Chidgk1 (talk) 16:21, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

I disagree with this proposal. They are two distinct topics. Nuclear power has long been a matter of public controversy and planning in Turkey, this started way before Akkuyu and encompassed various government bodies and other proposed plants. On the other hand, some of the contents for the power plant e.g. specifications would be distinctly out-of-place in the general article about nuclear power in Turkey. These are independently notable concepts. --GGT (talk) 18:31, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

• Oppose: I also disagree. Akkuyu Nuclear Power Plant is notable in itself and warrants an article. And it is normal in WP for a country to have a Nuclear power/energy in X article if it has a civil program. If we took the merge approach there are several other countries this would apply to, eg Nuclear power in the United Arab Emirates and Barakah nuclear power plant. Rwendland (talk) 10:46, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
• Oppose These are two different topics. Also, convenience of editing is not a reason for mergers --Ita140188 (talk) 11:52, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
• Oppose Your surprise is irrelevant. This is a power plant with many resources on its own. --Satirdan kahraman (talk) 12:19, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Source

https://thebulletin.org/2023/02/why-russia-may-control-turkeys-nuclear-energy-for-the-next-80-years/amp/ Chidgk1 (talk) 18:07, 15 March 2023 (UTC)