Talk:Human Interference Task Force

Most of this article

...is apparently not about the Human Interference Task Force, but about a similar project in Germany.— Preceding unsigned comment added by ToastIsTasty (talk • contribs) 06:39, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

The above comment was written back when the article was titled "Nuclear semiotics". For some reason the large section about the Zeitschrift für Semiotik project was left in this article after the rename to Human Interference Task Force, and the HITF report itself only mentions Sebeok, of the people quoted. I'll move the text to the more general article at long-time nuclear waste warning messages. --Lord Belbury (talk) 18:14, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: No opposition; nom's statement holds true when looking at the article. Moved. MacMed^talk_stalk 22:01, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

---

Nuclear semiotics → Human Interference Task Force — This article doesn't cover the topic of nuclear semiotics in general, but instead covers a research group that focused on the topic. The cited sources also refer to this specific group. --ToastIsTasty (talk) 06:39, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The article is just a summary of a technical report

this article is essentially just a summary of a technical report commissioned by the US govt. I don't see why this shouldn't be done in the main yacca mountain article. alternatively, there could be a generic article on long term information transfer. Gsykesvoyage (talk) 21:25, 31 May 2021 (UTC)