Talk:Nucleophilic aromatic substitution

Untitled

Is the SnAr mechanism really correct? I always learned that nucleophilic addition was the rate-determining step (hence the reason aryl fluorides react fastest due to polarization of the bond) and that the reaction was under kinetic control. Thoughts? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.67.118.139 (talk) 14:15, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: Material was a direct copy of an image from 'Organic Chemistry' by J. Clayden. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Lt40 (talk) 19:55, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: Material was a modification of an image from 'Organic Chemistry' by J. Clayden. The modification was simply the addition of the text 'Unstable phenyl cation with empty sp^2 orbital'. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Lt40 (talk) 19:55, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Nucleophilic aromatic substitution/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

This sentence in the article " the nitro group is an activator toward nucleophilic substitution, and an ortho/para director" is questionable. In another wikipedia article on Electrophilic Aromatic Substitution nitro is under the group categorized as a meta director.

Last edited at 17:21, 1 April 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 01:35, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

σH-adducts

The page only shows attach ispo to a leaving group (fair enough, it is the most common type). It mentions vicarious nucleophilic substitution but not the broader concept of nucleophilic substitution of hydrogen, where the nucleophile attacks elsewhere. Should we expand? Here are a couple of reviews (1st one open access): doi:10.1515/pac-2017-0108, doi:10.1021/cr020086+ Project Osprey (talk) 14:24, 26 September 2024 (UTC)